
What do foreigners think when Vietnamese people speak English?
xem xét tư pháp
The concept of judicial review, which empowers courts to evaluate the actions of other branches of government and declare them unconstitutional, can be traced back to the English common law tradition. During the 17th century, judges in England began interpreting statutes and constitutional documents in light of general principles of law and justice. This practice, known as "the rule of law," placed limits on the power of the monarch and the legislature, assuring that they did not act outside the bounds of the constitutional order. After the American Revolution, this common law tradition informed the development of the United States Constitution. The Founding Fathers, who were acutely aware of the excesses of the British monarchy, wrote the Constitution to safeguard the rights and liberties of citizens from government encroachment. The document contained several provisions that placed restrictions on the power of the federal government, known as "express," or "written," limits. However, the Founders also recognized that government often acted in mysterious or opaque ways that made it essential to establish a mechanism to enforce these limitations. Judicial review, therefore, emerged as a means to monitor the legislative and executive branches and to prevent them from infringing upon fundamental rights. In 1803, the U.S. Supreme Court solidified the concept of judicial review in Marbury v. Madison, a landmark decision that declared an act of Congress unconstitutional and challenged the previously held belief that the Constitution was a mere political guideline rather than a legal document. Since then, the scope and hermeneutic of judicial review have expanded to account for changing political, legal, and social realities, leading to debates, controversies, and crises regarding the possible limits of this practice. Nonetheless, the idea of judicial review remains a foundational tenet of the American constitution and legal system because it represents a democratic process that ensures the constitutional order's respect while protecting the dignity of individual rights.
(in the US) the power of the Supreme Court to decide if something is allowed by the Constitution
(ở Hoa Kỳ) quyền lực của Tòa án Tối cao trong việc quyết định xem điều gì đó có được Hiến pháp cho phép hay không
(in the UK) a procedure in which a court examines an action or decision of a public body and decides whether it was right
(ở Anh) một thủ tục trong đó tòa án xem xét hành động hoặc quyết định của một cơ quan công quyền và quyết định xem hành động hoặc quyết định đó có đúng hay không
Sẽ có một cuộc xem xét tư pháp về những thay đổi trong thị thực.
Vụ việc này sẽ được đưa ra xét xử lại.
một cuộc xem xét lại của tòa án về quyết định do Văn phòng chống gian lận nghiêm trọng đưa ra
Greenpeace sẽ tìm kiếm sự xem xét lại của tòa án nếu cuộc điều tra công khai đầy đủ không được tiến hành.
What do foreigners think when Vietnamese people speak English?
Immediately remove unnecessary sounds when pronouncing English
Mispronunciation - whose fault is it?
Tips for reading money in English very quickly and simply
English phrases often used by girlfriends that boyfriends must know
Master English communication situations over the phone
Immediately cure the disease of forgetting English vocabulary thoroughly for goldfish brain
Good and effective experience in practicing English reading
How to use split sentences in English is extremely simple
15 English idioms from fruit that will make you excited
Comment ()