Meaning and usage of the word leaderless in English

Meaning of vocabulary leaderless

leaderlessadjective

không có người lãnh đạo

/ˈliːdələs//ˈliːdərləs/

Origin of the word leaderless

The word "leaderless" has its roots in the mid-17th century. The earliest recorded use of the word "leaderless" dates back to 1658 in the English language. Initially, the term referred to something or someone without a leader or guide. In the 17th century, it was typically used to describe a movement, process, or activity that was unguided or lacking direction. Over time, the meaning of "leaderless" expanded to encompass groups or organizations that operated without a clear sense of direction or leadership. In the 20th century, the term gained prominence in the context of social movements, politics, and business, describing entities that operated outside traditional hierarchies or structures. Today, "leaderless" is often used to describe organizations, movements, or behaviors that prioritize collective or decentralized decision-making over traditional hierarchical structures. This shift in meaning reflects the evolving nature of leadership and the growing recognition of the importance of collaboration and collective action.

Vocabulary summary leaderless

typeadjective

meaningleaderless, leaderless

examplea leaderless rabble-a leaderless mob

Example of vocabulary leaderlessnamespace

  • The organization has been leaderless since the departure of its previous CEO, leaving the team in a state of uncertainty and confusion.
  • The committee found itself leaderless after the sudden resignation of its chairperson, leaving the remaining members struggling to fill the void.
  • The protestors, lacking a clear leader, were easily dispersed by the police as they failed to gain any sort of momentum.
  • After a string of failed attempts at finding a suitable leader, the group resorted to devolving decision-making power to a committee of members, creating a more democratic and leaderless system.
  • The team struggled to function efficiently without a defined leader, leading to a lack of direction and poor communication amongst its members.

Comment ()